Legal Opinion

People v. North

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1927No. Docket No. 1399PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant was convicted of robbery alleged by information of the district attorney of Los Angeles County to have been committed on or about the twenty-second day of February, 1926. A motion for new trial was presented, which was denied, and he appeals from the judgment and from the ruling upon said motion.

A witness for the People, named Arthur Niemi, testified that he and the defendant were on the date last mentioned employed by the Liggett Drug Company at Hollywood; that on the night of Washington’s Birthday the witness and one Oliver Peterson were closing the front door of the store, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. People v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In Re ColfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. People v. GriderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. FreithoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. RadovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. MurietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API