McGovern v. . City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs are contractors engaged in the construction of the Lexington avenue subway in the city of New York. They sue for a balance alleged to be due upon the completion of the work. Six causes of action are stated in the complaint. At the trial the plaintiffs succeeded upon all. The Appellate Division cut out the recovery upon the iu?st cause of action. This was for underpinning the stoops along the route. Elimination. of that item reduced the judgment from $330,381.28 to $131,485.90. In other respects the verdict was approved. There are cross-appeals in this court.
We think the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Osborn v. . CardezaNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Water Com'rs of City of DunkirkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Young Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
- Rinehart & Dennis Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.