Robinson v. Cooke
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
The Frankfort Farmers’ Elevator Company, a corporation, while engaged in business, was in need of money with which to conduct its business, and, in order to obtain the nec essary funds, executed four promissory notes. The contents of the notes become material in passing upon the assignments touching the validity of said notes. The promissory note given to M. E. Cooke is therefore set out in hsec verba:
“No.-
Frankfort, S'. D., January 30, 1927.
“On the 30th day of July, 1927, without grace, for value received, I, we, or either of us promise to pay to the order of M. E. Cooke, Frankfort, S.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bothwell v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
- Cissna Loan Co. v. GawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Crider v. San Antonio Real Estate, Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Hepner v. WheatleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Bledsoe v. . Nixon .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carey v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Lynam's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943