Legal Opinion

Cargill, Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. Lloyd Buis and Rose M. Buis, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 1976No. 76-1212, 76-1213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge.

We are concerned here with the extent of coverage of indebtedness by separate Letters of Guaranty signed by defendants, Lloyd Buis and Rose M. Buis, his wife. A subsidiary question raised on cross-appeal is the denial of attorneys’ fees to plaintiff’s attorneys.

The case was tried to the federal district court, 1 without the intervention of a jury, upon a written joint submission of the parties for final determination, based upon a stipulation of facts, documents and issues, together with other matters set out therein.

The court found as a matter of law that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Essex International, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Earl A. ClamageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Wright v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. WinstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Union Carbide Corporation, a Corporation v. Sidney KatzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McEntire v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. The United States Shoe Corporation v. Patrick A. Hackett and Rosemary H. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. International Paper Co. v. GrossmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. Jones Motor Co., Inc. v. Teledyne, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  5. Stewart v. GNP Commodities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API