Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas E. Cadotte

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1995No. 94-3837PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Douglas Cadotte appeals the sentence imposed by the District Court1 after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1988). We affirm.

Cadotte entered the Marshalltown Savings Bank in Toledo, Iowa, approached a teller and said “This is a robbery.” When the teller looked up at him doubtfully, Ca-*662dotte repeated his statement and told her he had a .357 magnum in his pocket and “no one will get hurt” if she put the money in the bag that had been placed on the counter.

At sentencing, Cadotte objected to the application of a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrew L. HunnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Maurice Lynell SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Robert Derek Bell, Also Known as Jimmy R. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Martin Briones-MataCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Robert RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Ernest AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. SallisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API