Legal Opinion

Boll v. Condie-Bray Glass & Paint Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 4, 1928PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGentry, J.

This case comes to us on appeal from the action of the circuit court in sustaining a demurrer to the evidence of appellant on both counts of his petition. The case is somewhat unusual in that appellant asked damages from respondent on two separate and distinct causes of action, each one due to alleged negligence and each resulting in personal injuries which he sustained.

In the first count, appellant alleged that respondent operated a paint manufacturing establishment in the city of St. Louis and used in connection therewith a freight elevator, and that appellant was employed by respondent as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durant v. Lexington Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Hunter v. Busy Bee Candy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Jones v. Pioneer Cooperage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cropper v. Titanium Pigment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Marie v. Standard Steel WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Hunt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Parks v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. Northwest Poultry & Egg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API