Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Roberts

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1942No. 2204PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

Charles D. Burnett was injured March 6, 1940, while engaged in work incidental to the manufacture of grain-doors, and claimed compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, alleging that the injury was sustained while he was a workman in the employment of Mason Roberts. He was allowed compensation for total, permanent disability caused by the injury. On appeal by the alleged employer, the sole question is whether there is substantial evidence to support a finding that the relation of the parties at the time of the injury was that of employer and employee.

Both Burnett and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Reife v. OsmersNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Wright v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Bradley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Railworks, Inc. v. NaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lichty v. Model HomesWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Harrill v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. McKenzie v. Neale Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Circle C Resources, Inc. v. KobieluszWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API