Legal Opinion

Reife v. Osmers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 24 opinions

(Brownell v. Board of Education, 239 N. Y. 369; Van Etten v. City of New York, 226 N. Y. 483.)

1Opinion of the CourtO’Bbien, J.

Defendant owned real property in Queens' county fronting sixty feet on Jamaica avenue and extending back one hundred feet. Plaintiff contracted to buy it. Between the dates of the contract and of the closing of title, a strip three and a quarter feet deep running along Jamaica avenue vested in the city of New York in a condemnation proceeding to widen that street. On the. closing day .plaintiff rejected title because part had vested in the city. This action is brought to recover the amount of the deposit and expenses and to declare such charges a hen on the land. On defendant’s motion for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Sewell v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Matter of Van Etten v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Clarke v. Long Island Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mesich v. Board of County Com'rs of McKinley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hecht v. MellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Arko Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Brooks v. YawkeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  5. Geist v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API