Legal Opinion

Moser v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1978No. Docket No. 30890Published

1Opinion of the CourtP. R. Mahinske, J.

This workers’ compensation appeal involves the problem of what standard to apply in thé case of an employee who suffers from a non-work-connected eye disease, obtains medical treatment which corrects his vision to near normal, and then loses all vision in one eye, partially as the result of work-related causes. We hold that the proper standard is the aggravation of preexisting infirmity standard of Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc, 394 Mich 466, 475-476; 232 NW2d 146 (1975).

Plaintiff William G. Moser began working for defendant Ford Motor Company in 1934. At the hearing plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lindsay v. Glennie Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hilton v. Oldsmobile Division of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API