Legal Opinion

Atlanta Cadillac Co. v. Manley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1923No. 13423PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. Whether or not a defendant bailee, in an action of tort brought by the owner to recover the value of property stolen while in the possession of the defendant, on account of an alleged lack of ordinary care for its protection, would be entitled to have the full panel of jurors placed upon voir dire with reference to their being officers, stockholders, or employees of an insurance company, on the theory that before the suit it had paid to the .plaintiff the amount of a theft policy covering the property, and had thus become subrogated to the plaintiff’s right of recovery, the refusal by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Renfroe v. FouchéCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atlanta Coach Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Lamon v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Richter Bros. v. Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Moffett v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Browder v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API