Legal Opinion

Robert Lee Haynes and Al Walter Bolden v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1963No. 20112PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge:

The two' appellants, defendants below, were tried and convicted separately of violations of Title 21 U.S.C. § 176a and Title 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a), and they have appealed. Separate briefs have been prepared and filed in behalf of each appellant. Both raise essentially the same questions, in a total of five specifications urged by Haynes and four relied on by Bolden. The following issues are presented by both briefs considered together: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction under both counts of the indictment; and (2) whether or not the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Jeremiah CountrymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Delgado, Emilio Albelo, Juan Carlos Riverol, Tomas Raul HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. James P. HornadayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Robert Meinster A/K/A Robbie, United States of America v. Robert Platshorn (A/k/a Bob Auction, A/K/A Bob Knapp, A/K/A Bob Elliott)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Encarnacion Moreno, Justiniano Orguiza, and Joseph Martinez Ruiz, A/K/A Alberto AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API