Legal Opinion
Wackeen v. Malis
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 2002No. B131353, B138921PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In these three consolidated appeals, we review orders on motions brought to enforce indemnification and attorney’s fees provisions contained in a written settlement agreement that was entered into by the appellants and respondents. The motions were brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
Defendants Tara Alane Moran, The Moran Family Trust, REM Ltd., The International Horse Foundation (formerly known as The Foundation for Thoroughbred Sciences, Inc.), 2 and Creekside Development, Inc. (collectively Moran) brought the section 664.6 motions, in which they contended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Mamika v. BarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Viejo Bancorp, Inc. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Casa De Valley View Owner's Assn. v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Williams v. SaundersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Gardena v. Rikuo Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Hines v. LukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Timney v. LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.