Neiman v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MORENO, District Judge.
Brian Neiman, who has been found guilty of illegally practicing law, seeks disability benefits to compensate him for loss of income derived entirely from that illegal activity. The Court grants summary judgment in favor of the insurer, precluding the Plaintiff from recovering under his disability insurance policy for an occupation he could not legally perform prior to his alleged disability.
On May 2, 2002, the Florida Supreme Court stated:
Neiman’s activities fail the “duck” test. That is, in common parlance, one would expect…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Solano v. a Navas Party Production, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Geronta Funding v. Brighthouse Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 2022