Legal Opinion

Leal v. Bedel

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 28, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00150Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MICHAEL LEAL, Case No. 1:22-cv-150 Plaintiff, Barrett, J. Litkovitz, M.J. v. FELICIA BEDEL, et al., REPORT AND Defendants. RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on defendant Chelsea Staedter’s special motion to strike plaintiff’s claims against her (Doc. 40). In this diversity case, Staedter seeks to invoke California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute, California Civil Procedure Code § 425.16, to strike plaintiff Michael Leal’s claims against her and recover her attorney fees.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API