Adams v. Soule
Supreme Court of Vermont
Bill in Chancery. The material points in the case are sufficiently stated the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.
The bill in this case sets forth and charges that the orator was induced, by the fraud of Soule, to purchase in a lease-hold interest and fixtures which Soule had in certain bowling-alley property in Burlington, belonging to the orator, as landlord, and therefor to execute to Soule his two negotiable promissory notes for seven hundred and fifty dollars each, one payable to said Soule on demand, the other six months from the date, which was the 12th day of October, 1848 ; the latter of which notes is claimed to be owned and held by Putnam bona fide and for valuable consideration ; that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bellas v. M'CartySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Scott v. BurnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Q. R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1915
- Passumpsic Savings Bank v. BuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.