Legal Opinion

Atlantic Gulf Fertilizer Co. v. Mayo-Lyles Store

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 11, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The declaration in this case was as follows: “Nathan Mayo and W. J. Lyles, co-partners doing business as Mayo-Lyles Store, by their attorney W. E. Smith, sue the Atlantic & Gulf Fertilizer Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, the defendant;

“For that, WHEREAS, on and prior to the 3rd day of September, 1926, and ever since that date, the defendant has been engaged in the business of manufacturing and sell ing commercial fertilizer in the State of Florida, and that on, to-wit: the 3rd day of September, 1926, in the County of Lake, State of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Greenblatt v. McCall & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Fleischer v. Virginia Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Southern Menhaden Co. v. HowSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  5. Goulding Fertilizer Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pembroke v. CaudillSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. Platt v. Kenco Chemical Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Shaw v. Armour & Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API