Legal Opinion
Platt v. Kenco Chemical Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 6, 1961No. 61-172PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, CHAS., Judge.
By common law certiorari the petitioner, who was the defendant below, seeks review of an order of the trial court granting a motion to dismiss his amended counterclaim. The respondent Kenco Chemical Co., Inc., had sued in the civil court of record in Dade County to collect a bill of $780 for liquid fertilizer. The defendant filed an amended counterclaim, alleging that plaintiff had warranted the fertilizer would improve the crop but that it had damaged the crop in the amount of $16,000 for which recovery was sought.
Petitioner contends that the court erred in holding its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peters v. HendrySupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Atlantic Gulf Fertilizer Co. v. Mayo-Lyles StoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Shaw v. Armour & Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Rosenfeld v. BoyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Davis v. FlatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Flamingo Blueprint, Inc. v. Monumental Properties of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. Dyer, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1966