Legal Opinion

Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 5, 1947No. Docket 147/229PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Advised of an appeal from the decree dismissing the bill of complaint in this cause after hearing, this opinion is now prepared and filed.

This is a suit for specific performance. Murray Holding Co. is the owner of property 98-102 Murray Street, and 45 Austin Street, Newark, New Jersey. On May 1st, 1946, the complainant made the following offer in writing to purchase the property:

"We have agreed to purchase property known as 98-102 Murray St. and 45 Austin St., Newark, N.J., upon which are located two, five-story connecting buildings, together with: — complete power plant, 2 generators, 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mausert v. FeigenspanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  2. K.S.S. Realty Co. v. OstroffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Aerial League of America v. Aircraft Fireproofing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  4. K. S. S. Realty Co. v. OstroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Abeles v. Adams Engineering Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Smith v. Shoreline Printers & Publishers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Mid-Continent Construction Co. v. GoldbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API