Wenzoski v. Central Banking System, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
We granted plaintiffs’ petition for hearing November 21, 1984. The court has been troubled by the procedural history of the case and requested additional briefing from the parties on the issue of whether plaintiffs’ notice of appeal was timely filed. The supplemental briefing convinces us that it was not. We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss December 19, 1980, and a judgment of dismissal was entered January 2, 1981. On December 31, 1980, plaintiffs filed a motion for new trial, reconsideration, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Olson v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by16 opinions
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Grobeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Griffin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Jones v. SieveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.