Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Grobeson v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 2010No. B207551PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, Acting P. J.

A jury rejected Mitchell Grobeson’s claims that the City of Los Angeles (City) and Daniel Watson unlawfully retaliated against Grobeson in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) and Labor Code section 1101 et seq.; that City and Watson unlawfully discriminated against Grobeson and harassed him in violation of the aforesaid statutes; that City constructively discharged *783Grobeson; and that appellant Watson unlawfully retaliated against Grobeson and harassed him in violation of FEHA and Labor Code section 1101 et…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  4. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. Allen and JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Duchrow v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. WeathertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Arakelian v. Tufenkchian CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Contreras-Velazquez v. Family Health Centers of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API