Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Espinoza
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 7, 2005No. CV 05-1813SJO(RC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.
IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; (3) claims (1) and (2) are determined to be untimely and claim (3) is denied on the merits, and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baggett v. KellerDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Quinteros v. HernandezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- John Laponte v. Gavin Newsom, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- McKettrick v. YatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Paddock v. Mendoza-PowersDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009