Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Fifth Amendment Taking; Closure of Waterway Outlet; Property Interest; Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Rule 12(b)(6); La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 690, et seq.; Predial Servitude; Enclosed Estate; Regulatory Taking; Lack of Property Interest in Deep-Draft Access; Lack of Direct Regulation of Private Property. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WILLIAMS, Judge.
The instant litigation arises from the 2009 closure of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (“MRGO”). Plaintiff Lone Star Industries, Inc. (“Lone Star”), brings this suit under the Fifth…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013