Legal Opinion

Lome v. Tax Commission

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry J. Latham, J.

This is an omnibus motion by the respondent, Tax Commission of the City of Few York to dismiss before answer the petition herein on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to warrant relief under the provisions of article 13 of the Tax Law, (2) that it appears on the face thereof that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the proceeding and that (3) the petitioners have no common or general interest entitling them to maintain this proceeding in a representative capacity. The movant prays “ for a further order, if required, pursuant to Rule 102 of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hilton v. FahrenkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y. v. . DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. People ex rel. Yaras v. KinnawNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Buffalo & State Line Railroad v. Board of SupervisorsCommission of Appeals · 1871
  5. Matter of Ackerman v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central School District No. 1 v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Luther Forest Corp. v. McGuinnessNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lome v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API