Legal Opinion

Dykstra v. Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1911No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Case by Mary Dykstra against the Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Mary Dykstra, the plaintiff, recovered a judgment against the defendant, a suburban railway company, in an action for negligence in starting its car, whereby she was thrown to the pavement and injured. The declaration alleges that:

“And plaintiff avers that, when said car arrived and stopped at Washington avenue, said plaintiff arose from her seat, carrying her purse in her left hand, and walked to the rear end of said car for the purpose of alighting therefrom, and, while in the act of alighting from the rear platform of said car as aforesaid, without any fault or negligence on her part, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conger v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bolton v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Moss v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API