Legal Opinion

Arkansas River Gas Co. v. Molk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1932No. 30,401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment overruling appellant’s motion to be substituted as plaintiff in this action and sustaining appellee’s motion that the action be dismissed.

To determine the propriety of the trial court’s rulings, the previous record of the case must be briefly stated:

On May 8, 1924, this action was begun by the Arkansas River Gas Company to recover from Isador Molk the sum of $2,470 as the value of certain oil-well casing alleged to be the property of plaintiff which defendant Molk had converted to his own use. The cause was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sleeper v. Bullen & DustinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Emery v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Manley v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Green v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. State ex rel. Henry v. McArthurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Bruun v. Katz Drug Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Weber Flour Mills Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API