Legal Opinion
United States v. Tardif
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided April 25, 2001No. CGCMG 1063; Docket No. 1141PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASSELS, Judge:
On 23 April 2001, we granted Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of our decision of 26 March 2001 in order that we might determine whether Appellant is entitled to credit under United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (CMA 1984) for twelve days of pretrial confinement by Texas authorities. In our earlier decision, we affirmed findings of guilty of two specifications of assault bn a child under 16 years of age, set aside a finding of guilty of a twelve-day unauthorized absence while Appellant was confined by civilian authorities, and affirmed the approved sentence of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Richard WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William B. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ricardo Garcia-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. YangerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. WestU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. YangerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.