Thomas v. City of Horse Cave
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Coubt by
Judge Ratliep
Affirming-
The appellants, Dr. H. B. Thomas, Mrs. Carrie 'Thomas, his wife, Mary Thomas Austin, Rnth Thomas Pohl, and her husband, “Doc” Pohl, own a tract of land in Horse Cave, a city' of the fifth class (hereinafter •called the city), on which is located the entrance to Hidden River Cave. This cave extends under a large part of the city and appellants take people through it for admission fees. The cave has two main avenues, and a •stream of water flows along the winding course of each avenue. A short distance below the confluence of the streams, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Litchfield v. . BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Cumb. Tel'p & Tel'g Co. v. City of HickmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Fox v. Western Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1867
- Eastern Kentucky Home Telephone Co. v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- County of Kane v. Elmhurst National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. HippSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Peoples Gas Co. of Ky. v. City of BarbourvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.