Legal Opinion

Miller v. Village of Brookville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1949No. 31684PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

This unfortunate controversy results from a number of inadvertences in the transfer of the land described in the plaintiffs’ petition.

On October 8,1936, Elgar and Elizabeth Weaver “in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations” deeded the tract to the village of Broolcville forever for use in perpetuity as a public park. That dead contains no forfeiture or reversion clause.

The village received and accepted the deed and took possession of the land for park purposes. The citizens of the village made continuous use of the park as such. Then a year and a half later the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kilpatrick v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. In Re Copps Chapel Methodist Episcopal ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission v. BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Board of Education v. Unknown Heirs of AughinbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. P C K Properties, Inc. v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. LoBueNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Summit County Historical Society v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API