Boehm v. Commercial Alliance Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Motion for a new trial on a case by the defendant, after a verdict for the plaintiff at the Circuit, January, 1894, in Monroe county.
1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.
Upon this motion the defendant raises but one question, although that is raised in several different ways. The point made by it is that certain statements made by the insured, which will be more particularly referred to hereafter, were warranties, and that, as some of them were not true, there should have been a verdict for the defendant instead of for the plaintiff. It is very doubtful whether the question sought to be presented was raised upon the trial. At the close of the testimony, the defendant moved for the direction of a verdict upon the ground that Dr. Henckell had attended the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jefferson Insurance v. H. & D. Cotheal.New York Supreme Court · 1831
- Mutual Fire Insurance v. DealeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- Haggart v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Holly v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Owens v. . Holland Purchase Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Louis v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Broadway & Ninety-Fourth Street, Inc. v. C. & L. Lunch Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1921
- Singleton v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Schane v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Singleton v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.