Legal Opinion

Frobouck v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 2013No. 2061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*266ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

KENNEY, J.

A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Washington County convicted Chad Eason Frobouck, appellant, of manufacturing marijuana. Appellant raises two questions for our review:

• “Did the motions judge err in denying the motion to suppress?”

• “Did the trial court improperly admit prejudicial hearsay?”

For the reasons that follow, we shall affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

SUPPRESSION HEARING

Factual And Procedural Background

At the September 6, 2011 hearing on appellant’s motion to “suppress all evidence obtained by police authorities as the result of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hallowell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API