Hayes v. Cable
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
We hold it was error to dismiss the plaintiffs claim based on undue influence. Undue influence is “the exercise of an improper influence over the mind and will of another to such an extent that his professed act is not that of a free agent, but in reality is the act of the third person who procured the result.” Lee v. Ledbetter, 229 N.C. 330, 332, 49 S.E. 2d 634, 636 (1948). Whether there was undue influence is to be determined by the jury from all the evidence including circumstantial evidence. See In re Will of Franks, 231 N.C. 252, 56 S.E. 2d 668 (1949), reh. denied, 231 N.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- In Re the Will of FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- In Re the Will of BealeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Lee v. . LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hayes v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Holloway v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012