Legal Opinion

Zajac v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The plaintiff, the only witness to the accident, testified in substance that, observing the middle roll was stopped, he reached through the opening beneath the bearing to start it; that when he touched the bottom of the roll it moved fast and caught his hand; that ho “yanked it and pulled it out,” that the nails on the inside of the belt scraped the back of his fingers and knuckles and that the roll turned the arm and broke it. The only other evidence bearing on the manner in which the plaintiff’s hand was caught is the testimony of the plaintiff’s mechanical expert, who stated that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Hare v. Cocheco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  2. Cassidy v. Atlantic Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  3. Bjork Ex Rel. Bjork v. United States Bobbin & Shuttle Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  4. Fontaine v. Johnson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  5. Hicks v. Claremont Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Bridges v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Owen v. Elliot HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Levesque v. American Box & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. Dubuc v. Amoskeag Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API