Legal Opinion

Wright v. Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1901Published

Appeal by- the plaintiff, Alfred P. Wright, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office ,óf the clerk-of the county of Queens on the '8th day of January, 1900, upon the report of a referee dismissing the¡ complaint upon the merits. . .

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

The action is against an executor for labor done for his testator, for materials furnished and for money lent from 1881-throughóüt a number of years. It was tried before a referee, who dismissed the complaint on the merits.

I think that the judgment must be reversed for error in the exclusion'of testimony. The plaintiff produced Exhibits A and B for identification and testified that they were his account books for 1882 and 1883 respectively. He then produced Exhibit C for identification, as his account book from 1881 to 1894. ' He testified that he . kept, these books and that he had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vosburgh v. ThayerNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  2. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. In the Matter of McGoldrick v. . TraphagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Smith v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Beebe v. BullNew York Supreme Court · 1834

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API