Legal Opinion

Gelsumino v. E. W. Bliss Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 2, 1973No. 54627PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

By their amended complaint, founded on theories of negligence and strict liability, plaintiffs sued for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained in a punch press accident and for loss of consortium. When plaintiffs refused to settle the case at a pretrial conference, the pretrial judge instructed both defendants to file motions for summary judgment which were subsequently filed and granted. Plaintiffs now appeal, contending that tire trial court erred when it granted the motions for summary judgment, because the pleadings, motions, supporting affidavits, answers and supporting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Tj HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Reed v. AlbaneseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Moren v. Samuel M. Langston Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Rivera v. Rockford MacHine & Tool Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mike Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corporation and Ozark Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Scott v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Olson v. A. W. Chesterton Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Zavala v. Powermatic, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API