Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Camden Iron Works

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On error to Camden Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Collins, J.

The plaintiff sought recovery for personal injuries alleged to be due to the defendant’s negligence. The declaration averred that, while in the employment of the defendant as a riveter, the plaintiff was ordered by the defendant to leave his employment and assist in raising a large frame of great weight, and that by reason of the defendant’s careless omission to supply and use, in raising the frame, the means necessary to raise the same and hold it in place while being raised, it fell and injured the plaintiff.

At the trial the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Brien v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. PrzezdziankowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lagler v. RochIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Curley v. HoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  4. Laragay v. East Jersey Pipe Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Owens v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API