Amber Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THAPAR, Circuit Judge.
The contempt power ensures that the judiciary’s mandates are authoritative rather than advisory. But an imperious judiciary is just as problematic as a powerless one. So the contempt power is limited: A party cannot be-held in contempt unless it has violated a definite and specific court order. Exactly when a court order becomes definite and specific is the question of this appeal.
I
Global Fitness Holdings (“Global Fitness”) owned and operated a number of gyms. The plaintiffs were members of those gyms and believed that Global Fitness misrepresented the terms of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Life Technologies Corporation v. Krishnamurthy GovindarajCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Puff v. PuffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Beiter v. Chase Home Fin., LLC (In re Beiter)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Amaazz Construction Group, LLC v. CMI Roadbuilding, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Ashley Boshea as Administrator of the Estate of David John Boshea v. Compass Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.