Legal Opinion

Seah Steel Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 19, 2010No. Slip Op. 10-60; Court 09-00248PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, Judge.

This matter comes before the Court, on a motion for judgment on the agency record brought by Plaintiff, SeAH Steel Corporation (“SeAH”), pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade (“USCIT”).

Plaintiff, challenges numerous aspects of the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) administrative determination with respect to Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipes From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 Fed.Reg. 31,242 (June 30, 2009), Public Record Doc. No. 77…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. SeAH Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  2. Eregli Demir Ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  4. Union Steel Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  5. Matra Americas, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API