Smart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction rendered on the verdict of a jury finding Jack Smart guilty of unlawful possession of corn whisky, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 45 days.
The errors assigned relate to ruling of the court in the admission of alleged improper evidence and question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The state relies on the testimony of two witnesses to sustain the conviction.
J. H. McKenzie testified that he was constable of Morgan township; that he went to defendant’s home in the oil fields…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Cantrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Munson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Lunceford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Atkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- McPhetridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.