Legal Opinion
Jackson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1952No. 8 Div. 61PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
The complaint filed against this appellant, omitting the formal parts, charges that he. “did wilful and maliciously damage or destroy a pipe or water main or works erected, for the purpose of supplying buildings and other property in the Town of Muscle Shoal in said County,” etc.
Demurrers addressed to the complaint were overruled by the court.
The prosecution was instituted under the provisions of Sec. 84(8) Title 14, Code of Alabama 1940, that “Any person who shall wilfully or maliciously remove, damage or destroy:
* % * * * *
“(8) A pipe or main for conducting gas, water or oil,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grattan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Morningstar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Collins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
- Stinson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- L. Glen Riley v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Gayden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Associated Industries of Alabama, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- King v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
- United States v. McDuffieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.