Legal Opinion

People v. Cameron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 2011No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [3]). Defendant correctly contends that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his contention that County Court erred in setting the expiration date of the order of protection from the date of sentencing rather than the date of conviction (see People v Cambridge, 55 AD3d 1381 [2008]). Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), we nevertheless exercise our power to review that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. FlaxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. CambridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. KalbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. MaharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. KALB, CHRISTOPHER, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API