Legal Opinion
United States v. Locke
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 8, 2018No. Criminal No. 1:17–CR–210PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2 It is unclear why the Fourth Circuit elected not to publish these opinions, but what is clear is that they not only said it, but two separate panels said it and ignoring that would be foolish absent a strong reason to do so.
3 See also United States v. Padilla , 387 F.3d 1087, 1091 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that "[t]here is no difference in substance between the language quoted in Lewis and that of § 922(g)(1).")
4 See also United States v. Muir , No. 1:03-cr-162, 2006 WL 288419, at *1-2 (D. Utah Feb. 6, 2006) (denying a motion to dismiss § 922(g)(9) charge because the defendant's MCDV…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Billy Joe Sowell v. Margaret Bradshaw, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Angela RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Nicholas PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. David Michael LejaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RalstonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019