Legal Opinion

Mayle, Warden v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 2003No. 01-1487PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Lockyer v. Andrade, ante, p. 63.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richard Napoleon Brown v. D.A. Mayle Attorney General of the State of California, Earnest Bray, Jr. v. Eddie Ylst, Interim Warden Attorney General of the State of California Daniel E. LundgrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Brown v. MayleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Penton v. KernanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API