Legal Opinion
Richard Napoleon Brown v. D.A. Mayle Attorney General of the State of California, Earnest Bray, Jr. v. Eddie Ylst, Interim Warden Attorney General of the State of California Daniel E. Lundgren
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2002No. 99-17261PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
283 F.3d 1019
Richard Napoleon BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
D.A. MAYLE; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
Earnest Bray, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Eddie Ylst, interim Warden; Attorney General of the State of California; Daniel E. Lundgren, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 99-17261.
No. 99-56197.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted December 12, 2001.
Filed February 7, 2002.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellants.
Brian R. Means and Stephanie A. Miyoshi, State of California Department of Justice, for the appellees.
Appeal from…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mayle, Warden v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2003