Legal Opinion

O'Toole v. Faulkner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1904No. 4894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Linn, L, entered February 18, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This cause was once before in this court on appeal, as will appear in O'Toole v. Faulkner, 29 Wash. 544, 70 Pac. 58. The judgment was reversed, with instructions to sustain the plaintiffs demurrer to-an affirmative answer of the defendant. Upon the return of the cause to the superior court, the remaining issues were tried before the court and a jury. A verdict Was returned for the defendant, and judgment entered accordingly. The plaintiff has again appealed.

Heference to the former opinion will show that the action is for personal injuries received by the appellant Margaret O’Toole, through…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Perine v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Sackman v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Dickson v. McGraw Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Wormley v. HamburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  5. Nearpass v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van VleckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Ikenberry v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. O'Connor v. SlatterWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Adams Marine Service, Inc. v. FishelWashington Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API