Legal Opinion

Barber S. S. Lines, Inc. v. Quinn Bros.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 27, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 50-409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is based on the contention that any recovery by plaintiff would be barred by the common law principle that there can be no indemnity or contribution between joint tort-feasors. Defendant conceives the question as one governed by the law of New York. It is true that the action is one arising from a tort, and hence is to be governed by the law of the place of the tort. But the tort alleged here is a maritime one, and hence it is to be governed not by the common law of any state, but by the general maritime law, as interpreted and applied by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc. v. Delta Marine Drilling Company, Delta Marine Drilling Company v. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Gomes v. Eastern Gas and Fuel AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
  3. Penn Tanker Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  4. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API