Legal Opinion
Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 28, 1961No. Civ. A. 61-469-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFREY, District Judge.
The complaint in this removed action, originally filed by plaintiff Michael H. Juliano, a citizen of Massachusetts, in the Superior Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts, alleges, in substance, that he invented a machine for the dicing of vegetables; that at the request of an agent for the defendant, an Ohio corporation, he delivered his invention to the defendant in confidence, on the condition that defendant would not copy the machine ; that the defendant paid the plaintiff $100.00, by cheek, for the machine and further agreed to pay plaintiff an additional amount…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Sandlin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Kinnear-Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ofria v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
- Tessier v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1971
- Berger v. Winer Sportswear, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1972
- Ofria v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981