Churchill v. Skjerding
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs, rendered after a jury trial, determining in effect that the document offered by the defendants for probate as the last will and testament of Eva Churchelow is not her last will and testament. The defendants, who are the proponents of the will, had prevailed in the Probate Court for the district of Waterbury where the document had been admitted.1 From this decision, the plaintiffs, the children of Eva Churchelow’s deceased son, who are among her heirs-at-law, took an appeal to the Superior Court. A jury trial resulted in a general…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Shulman v. ShulmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. HasanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Discover Leasing, Inc. v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Prishwalko v. Bob Thomas Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. HaggoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Bonan v. Goldring Home Inspections, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.