Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1926No. 17039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGDSON, C.

Of the numerous errors assigned in the petition in error only those embraced by the first propo sition stated in defendant’s- brief will be considered. That ¡proposition is ^

“The trial court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff against this defendant for the sum of $12,000 on plaintiff’s first cause of action, in that said judgment was not sustained by the evidence and -was contrary to the evidence and was contrary to law.”

It the consideration and determination of this proposition it will -be necessary to state in abstract form the salient facts disclosed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sickles v. Mt. Whitney Power & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Board of Ed., City of Alva v. FulkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Ed. v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API