Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1926No. 17039PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGDSON, C.
Of the numerous errors assigned in the petition in error only those embraced by the first propo sition stated in defendant’s- brief will be considered. That ¡proposition is ^
“The trial court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff against this defendant for the sum of $12,000 on plaintiff’s first cause of action, in that said judgment was not sustained by the evidence and -was contrary to the evidence and was contrary to law.”
It the consideration and determination of this proposition it will -be necessary to state in abstract form the salient facts disclosed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sickles v. Mt. Whitney Power & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Board of Ed., City of Alva v. FulkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Ed. v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- State Ex Rel. v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947