State v. Villa
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor while his license was suspended, a class five felony, and was placed on probation for three years on the condition that he serve six months in the Department of Corrections. On appeal, he contends that 1) his motion for directed verdict should have been granted because the state failed to establish the corpus delicti and failed to present substantial evidence to establish that his license was suspended, and 2) that a mistrial should have been granted because of the prosecutor’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Wainwright v. BoykinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. GerlaughArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Burks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JONES EX REL. COUNTY OF MARICORACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- City of Easley v. PortmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- City of Easley v. PortmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Clark v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Clark v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005