Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nhep v. Roisen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1989No. C7-89-296Published

1ConcurrenceFoley, Judge

I concur in the result, because of precedent, on the issue of punitive damages. See Morris v. Littler, 399 N.W.2d 673 (Minn.Ct.App.1987); Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor Store, 373 N.W.2d 318 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). It is my view that the time has come for the legislature to enact appropriate legislation that driving under the influence alone constitutes egregious conduct warranting the submitting of the issue of punitive damages to the jury in automobile accident cases.

In Hawkinson v. Geyer, 352 N.W.2d 784 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), this court observed:

A majority of the states that have addressed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawkinson v. GeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Morris v. LittlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API